|
Patterns of Peace:
Threads in the Human Tapestry
~~~~~~~~~~~~
by Peter Barreda, June 19, 2004
(Material copyright 2004,
all rights reserved)
|
 |
|
|
We
spend our lives weaving the threads of existence into a vast
tapestry that spans the whole of our history and our culture.
We work desperately to force the weave into patterns we
think we like, that we've been taught are righteous and moral,
without thinking much to question these pre-conceived standards
of behavior. It is, after all, more comforting to believe without
question, and doubt is an unpleasant thorn in one's side. We
favor those that weave as we weave, whose threads are the same
colors as ours, whose patterns match our patterns. We speak proudly
and loudly of which patterns are most correct, and of course
these are the patterns we've been taught to practice. We
stand at the top of the hill and look proudly around us and think
we are the virtuous ones, the tolerant ones, the benefactors
and saviors of all that we see. But a loom that is forced
cannot follow the natural course of things. A tapestry created
with excessive intent and manipulation can never become a tapestry
of enduring strength.
The affairs of Humankind
are as ambiguous and debatable as the sky is wide, so to argue
too strongly or certainly that one course is better than another
is a pointless endeavor. To paraphrase Chuang-Tzu, the famous
Taoist philosopher, if you and I are discussing a point, and
you get the better of me in the debate, does that necessarily
make you right and me wrong? Or if I win the debate, does that
make my position the correct one? Of course not. All sides can
argue their point unto the death, and the issue will remain unresolved.
They may debate and hate and fight and kill until there is not
a single person standing on the planet and still the issue will
remain unclear. Each side believes it is the right and the virtuous
one, so to stand too firmly in the windstorm of ideas is to crack
like a brittle twig. To be assured that one's position is absolutely
correct is to be blind to that same assuredness in others. It
is to proclaim, with stupid confidence, "Everybody is a
fool but me."
Contrarily, the affairs of nature
and the universe when studied on a wider scale are not ambiguous
at all. The elements of reality weave within and without each
other in a beautiful dance of precision, choreographed by eternity.
We see the beauty of stars as they sweep through the vastness
of space, communities of galaxies clustered into their own little
corners of the void. In the cold reaches of infinity matter finds
itself, and with open arms shares the secret energy of the universe.
Heat and life embrace and grow and evolve beyond the boundaries
of the imagination. These threads of the universal tapestry have
developed through their natural tendencies to support each other
and work with each other in a display of harmony and effectiveness
that we can only dream of. It is this weave that we must emulate,
this pattern we must adopt. It is a pattern of cooperation rather
than domination.
Since no position is absolute,
no particular group can claim itself morally justified to command
and control another, to attack or enslave or otherwise dominate
a weaker culture. I say this not out of some naive view of human
affairs-- I fully understand and concede our violent history,
the savage nature of our origins, the evolutionarily merciless
manner that we've interacted for longer than we can remember.
"Might makes right" has indeed been the long-standing
slogan of the human race, and we have exercised it again and
again, tirelessly, for many thousands of years. But we must come
to a point in our development as a species when we can move beyond
this, when we realize that what "might" actually achieves
is not right, but rather victory. This is fine if you are the
victor, unfortunate if you are the vanquished. The problem is
that no victory is eternal, and the vanquished will usually resurface
with their problems and anger redoubled for their suffering.
It has been the norm in the history of human conflict to identify
an enemy and eliminate him. And where there was no conflict,
an imbalance of power often proves to be enough. The powerful
overrun the weak, anger and injustice springs forth hatred and
resentment, and such powerful, culturally-embedded emotions endure
for many thousands of years. We see the truth of this around
us, every day.
So if victory is an ephemeral condition of questionable effectiveness, might we not perhaps reconsider our approach? Perhaps we should not seek victory, but balance, as the universe at large has achieved. After all, if one were to ask what it is that we all ultimately want, the reply will undoubtedly be that the world should achieve such ideals as peace, justice, equality-- essentially we seek a state of harmony in human affairs. But we will never-- absolutely never-- achieve this harmonious state through force and battle. It is impossible to coerce peace and acceptance out of a people that do not agree with you. As noble as you believe your position to be, your opponent believes the same about their position. So the most effective course of action is not to force your ways upon others, but to arrive at a worldview in which we are all one nation, one extended family, discussing our differences. In such a world there would not be a "we" (who are right) and a "they" (who are wrong). One way or another we are all right, to varying degrees. It must not be our goal to make others believe as we do, but rather to figure out how all of our beliefs and opinions may coexist. If we do not separate ourselves into "us" and "them," we may be able to say something like "Some of us are this way, and some of us are that way-- how can our different ways meet?"
To say that all sides of a point
are "right" does not justify the acts of barbaric violence
that we have recently witnessed, whichever side they were on.
Rather, it means that we must stop defining people by their actions,
whether we approve of those actions or not. Instead we must deal
with their issues, and work to resolve our differences. Currently
we identify people that behave in ways we disapprove of, label
them enemies, and strive to eliminate them. To react in this
way is to perpetuate a cycle of violence that is literally without
end. What we must learn to do is to act not out of indignation,
but out of a sincere desire to bring a balance to the theater
of human affairs.
It is this kind of balance that is so prevalent in the universe around us, inherent to the nature of all things. Rivers and mountains flow peacefully around each other, moss grows in the most beneficial environment, clouds go where the wind flows and ocean currents move in a lovely ballet whose stage spans the entire planet. Of course, the natural harmony we see around us today is a result of ages of geological cataclysm, but in this way we can clearly see that the age of conflict is a temporary one. We as a species have certainly experienced enough conflict-- when will we be ready for peace?
Each element of the universe is a thread in the most elegant tapestry ever woven. But be very clear that this harmonious picture of nature is not merely a poetic metaphor of Humanity's potential. It is a reality, a blueprint, of what we must aspire to. Just as our terrestrial ecology is a natural function of the progress of universal evolution, so is Human cultural development. We have passed through long periods of unrest and violence-- there is abundant evidence of this in the course of Human history. But how long this period of violence lasts is in part up to us. I say "in part" because of the disconnectedness present in our society. It is not enough for an enlightened few to realize the need for harmony. Nor is it enough to popularly proclaim the desire for peace, no matter how loudly. We must sincerely want it as a society, across the wide spectrum of cultures, or it cannot be achieved. Whether we are ready to move beyond our violent past remains to be seen.
Humankind is a crucial element
of this magnificent universal tapestry, and we must learn to
weave the threads of our own lives with as much harmony and grace
as we see around us. From this will grow compassion, humility
and generosity. We have certainly generated drastic differences
among ourselves throughout our brief but violent history, but
these distinctions are all artificial and illusory. We have created
these elements of ego to define ourselves, to separate and elevate
ourselves, and they have well fulfilled their purpose. But they
are also inevitably destructive and divisive, and we must now
consciously cast them aside. We must stop playing the game of
"I am better than you" because in that game there are
no winners, only temporary victors, and the ultimate casualty
is the entire human race. |
Please
share your thoughts on this essay here
Continue
to next essay
Return
to mandalaZone archives menu
(Material copyright
2004, all rights reserved. No portion of this text
may be used or reproduced without the express written consent
of the author.)
|
(return
to map) |